All in all, the Knapton and Dixon (2017) news release provides information regarding the eight failures of the Grenfell Tower’s fire incident, however it fails to mention the severity or importance of the failures or the critical factor that could have possibly been the reason to the other failures.
"No regular Inspection" was the most vital failure which leads to the other failures. Should regular inspection be conducted, the chances of other failures occurring are minimal. From the article “Building Inspection System for Evaluating the Technical Performance of Existing buildings” (Bortolini, Forcada, 2018), it stated the importance of building inspection and how it is essential for planning any maintenance actions to improve the condition and functionality of a building. It also stated that the main purpose of an inspection is to acquire useful information about the technical performance of a building which includes “structural, physical, and well-functioning building equipment”.
Therefore, regular inspections are essential to a building’s general maintenance and it should have been carried out for Grenfell Tower. Knowing the existing and potential issues is crucial to ensuring the safety, aesthetics and value of a building. If the potential failures of Grenfell Tower were predicted with regular building inspections, corrective measures or actions could have been implemented, preventing other failures from occurring.
Another critical failure is that the Grenfell Tower failed to install a fire pumping system in the building. The presence of a fire pumping system is very important when an undesirable fire event occur. They would emit fire containment substances like foam, in addition to water. In the article “Availability of fire pumping systems under periodic inspection” (Sobral, 2016), it stated that whenever a fire occurs, and something goes wrong, the operability of the fire pumping system is one of the first issues to be analysed by insurance companies. This proves how imperative the presence of a fire pump system in a building is. It could have saved more lives in the tragic event of Grenfell Tower Inferno.
In conclusion, these failures could have been avoided with regular reviews and better-fireproofing standards. It is also crucial to have mentioned the importance or severity of each failure to allow future engineers or designers to delve into and learn from them, preventing such incident from happening again in the future.
References
References
R. B., & N. F. (2018, October 05). Building Inspection System for Evaluating the Technical Performance of Existing buildings. Retrieved February 03, 2019, from https://ascelibrary-org.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/doi/full/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001220
S. J. (2016, December). Availability of fire pumping systems under periodic inspection. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710216301693
S. J. (2016, December). Availability of fire pumping systems under periodic inspection. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710216301693
Thanks for the effort in this essay, Hairi
ReplyDeleteHere are some areas for us to discuss:
- language issues in your otherwise clear summary
- lack of sufficient citation/reporting conventions in the summary
- fairly good focus of the essay
- inaccurate method for citing sources in-text
- minor wording/language use of your thesis
- some expression problems in the supporting paragraphs
- the lack of your in-text citations' and reference list's alignment with APA
Let's talk soon.
Brad
p.s. The black wallpaper for your blog makes reading easy but doesn't lend itself to me copying any text to give your a specific recommendation on language use. Woud you consider moving to back letters on a white background?
Thank you for your comment Sir Blackstone, however i apologise as there might be a little mistake with the title heading. I have not change my Title heading of this post from "draft 2" to "Draft 1" before u commented, therefore i am afraid you are actually commenting on my draft 1 instead of draft 2. It would be very much appreciated if you could review on my draft 2 post.
ReplyDeleteThank you!
hairi