Wednesday, February 6, 2019

Summary_Readers Response (Draft 1)

In the news release, “Eight failures that left people of Grenfell Tower at mercy of the inferno”, Knapton and Dixon (2017) reported the eight failures of the Grenfell Tower’s fire incident. Until 1986, all buildings in London adhered to the London building act which demanded that external walls have a minimum of at least 1 hour of fire resistance. However, during the Margaret Thatcher’s government, the law was changed which removed the critical time stipulations. Also, a coroner’s report in 2013 following a 2009 fire in South London was responded by Community Secretary Eric Pickles who reassured that a government review on building regulations would be published in 2016/17. Till today, there is still no updated regulation. The physical aspect of the Grenfell tower was also a vital cause to the fire incident. Firstly, the claddings were thought to be made out of a flammable plastic core, and the position of the claddings also acted as wind tunnels to spread the fire upwards. Secondly, there was no central sprinkler system in the building, and some of the front doors were not fireproof doors. Also, the Grenfell Tower only had one staircase which made escaping and rescue difficult and lastly, no regular inspection was being conducted for the building.

All in all, the Knapton and Dixon (2017) news release provides information regarding the eight failures of the Grenfell Tower’s fire incident, however it fails to mention the severity or importance of the failures or the critical factor that could have possibly been the reason to the other failures.

"No regular Inspection" was the most vital failure which leads to the other failures. Should regular inspection be conducted, the chances of other failures occurring are minimal. From the article “Building Inspection System for Evaluating the Technical Performance of Existing buildings” (Bortolini, Forcada, 2018), it stated the importance of building inspection and how it is essential for planning any maintenance actions to improve the condition and functionality of a building. It also stated that the main purpose of an inspection is to acquire useful information about the technical performance of a building which includes “structural, physical, and well-functioning building equipment”.

Therefore, regular inspections are essential to a building’s general maintenance and it should have been carried out for Grenfell Tower. Knowing the existing and potential issues is crucial to ensuring the safety, aesthetics and value of a building. If the potential failures of Grenfell Tower were predicted with regular building inspections, corrective measures or actions could have been implemented, preventing other failures from occurring.

Another critical failure is that the Grenfell Tower failed to install a fire pumping system in the building. The presence of a fire pumping system is very important when an undesirable fire event occur. They would emit fire containment substances like foam, in addition to water. In the article “Availability of fire pumping systems under periodic inspection” (Sobral, 2016), it stated that whenever a fire occurs, and something goes wrong, the operability of the fire pumping system is one of the first issues to be analysed by insurance companies. This proves how imperative the presence of a fire pump system in a building is. It could have saved more lives in the tragic event of Grenfell Tower Inferno.

In conclusion, these failures could have been avoided with regular reviews and better-fireproofing standards. It is also crucial to have mentioned the importance or severity of each failure to allow future engineers or designers to delve into and learn from them, preventing such incident from happening again in the future.



References
R. B., & N. F. (2018, October 05). Building Inspection System for Evaluating the Technical Performance of Existing buildings. Retrieved February 03, 2019, from https://ascelibrary-org.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/doi/full/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001220

S. J. (2016, December). Availability of fire pumping systems under periodic inspection. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710216301693






2 comments:

  1. Thanks for the effort in this essay, Hairi

    Here are some areas for us to discuss:
    - language issues in your otherwise clear summary
    - lack of sufficient citation/reporting conventions in the summary
    - fairly good focus of the essay
    - inaccurate method for citing sources in-text
    - minor wording/language use of your thesis
    - some expression problems in the supporting paragraphs
    - the lack of your in-text citations' and reference list's alignment with APA

    Let's talk soon.

    Brad

    p.s. The black wallpaper for your blog makes reading easy but doesn't lend itself to me copying any text to give your a specific recommendation on language use. Woud you consider moving to back letters on a white background?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your comment Sir Blackstone, however i apologise as there might be a little mistake with the title heading. I have not change my Title heading of this post from "draft 2" to "Draft 1" before u commented, therefore i am afraid you are actually commenting on my draft 1 instead of draft 2. It would be very much appreciated if you could review on my draft 2 post.

    Thank you!
    hairi

    ReplyDelete

Critical Reflection

My personal aim of this module at the start of the course is to have the ability to channel my thoughts into words and to also write confi...